Case 2307733/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Islam Kovaci v Konextions Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2307733/2020
- Decision date
- 5 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fowell
- Panel members
- Ms A Williams, Ms B Brown
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Islam Kovaci
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Croydon by video on 10 and 11 February 2022. The claimant, Mr Islam Kovaci, appeared in person. The respondent was Konextions Limited, represented by Mr I Myles, Managing Director. The tribunal was composed of Employment Judge Fowell with lay members Ms A Williams and Ms B Brown.
The judgment dismissed the complaint of race discrimination and the complaint of discrimination on grounds of religion or belief. It also dismissed the unfair dismissal claim because the claimant did not have the necessary two years' service. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claimant did not have the necessary two years' service. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.