Case 2307752/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Gerry v Channel Facilities Management — 2022
- Case reference
- 2307752/2020
- Decision date
- 12 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Freer Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Gerry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 16 March 2022, the Tribunal gave Mr D Gerry an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The stated grounds were that he had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 6 January 2022 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations within the time allowed, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 19 April 2022 did not take place.
The judgment is procedural only and does not record any substantive determination of the merits, any liability findings, or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type(s); it records only that the claim was struck out after the claimant failed to comply with the order dated 6 January 2022 and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter of 16 March 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.