Case 2307792/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Endriuskaite v Allercade Limited (T/A Portman Wealth) and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 2307792/2020
- Decision date
- 31 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Freer Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms N Endriuskaite
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Freer found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. The claim was brought by Ms N Endriuskaite against Allercade Limited (T/A Portman Wealth) and Michael Haston under case number 2307792/2020.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Ms Endriuskaite the gross sum of £4,233.60. The judgment states that the claimant is to account for tax and National Insurance as appropriate, indicating that the award was made as a gross payment rather than a net figure.
The judgment does not record any separate findings on other claims, any dispute about liability, or any additional remedy components beyond the wage deduction award. No lay members are listed on the judgment, which was issued by Regional Employment Judge Freer on 31 March 2021.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £4,233.60, with the claimant to account for tax and National Insurance as appropriate. | Upheld | — | £4,234 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,234
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.