Case 2307793/2020 · Employment Tribunal
M Cochand v Allercade Limited, trading as Portman Wealth and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 2307793/2020
- Decision date
- 23 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Carney Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
M Cochand
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 20 December 2022, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37. The judgment was signed by Employment Judge Carney and sent to the parties on 23 January 2023. No substantive merits findings or monetary award were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to the claim as a whole and does not separately discuss this head; it was struck out under rule 37 after the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing following the 20/12/2022 notice. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to the claim as a whole and does not separately discuss this head; it was struck out under rule 37 after the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing following the 20/12/2022 notice. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.