Case 2307863/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Madzharoglu v Yasero Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2307863/2020
- Decision date
- 2 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Madzharoglu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which no response had been entered by the respondent, Yasero Limited. On that basis, Employment Judge Andrews recorded that the claimant, Mrs A Madzharoglu, succeeded in her claim for unpaid wages.
The judgment did not determine remedy. Instead, it directed that the remedy hearing was already listed for 4 March 2021, and that the respondent would be permitted to participate only at the Judge's discretion. The claimant was ordered to send the Tribunal and the respondent a remedy statement and supporting documents by 25 February 2021, including a calculation of the sums claimed and details of mitigation. A Turkish interpreter was to be available at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: no response having been entered by the respondent, the claim of unpaid wages succeeds. The remedy was not determined in this judgment and was listed for a hearing on 4 March 2021. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.