Case 2307918/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Uddin v The Spinning Wheel Restaurant Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2307918/2020
- Decision date
- 2 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mclaren Representation
- Venue
- London South Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Uddin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr A Uddin worked for The Spinning Wheel Restaurant Limited from December 2019 as a porter/cook. The tribunal found that he was employed on a zero-hours contract, that the restaurant closed on 19 March 2020 because of the pandemic, and that he did no work and received no wages until the restaurant reopened in October 2020. The only claim before the tribunal was for unlawful deduction from wages under section 13 ERA 1996, said to relate to the period from 19 March 2020 to 30 September 2020.
The tribunal accepted that there had been communication with staff about furlough, including Zoom meetings and WhatsApp messages, and found that the respondent had told employees it would apply for furlough and pass the money on if it was obtained. It found that the respondent had not promised to top wages up to 100%, and that the arrangement was conditional on the respondent receiving furlough money from HMRC. The tribunal also found that the respondent did apply for furlough, but the application was refused because HMRC records showed no employees on the payroll on 19 March 2020, so the respondent did not qualify under the scheme.
Applying the statutory test for unlawful deductions, the tribunal held that there was no deduction from wages because no wages were properly payable during the closure period on the facts found. It also held that the claimant was not entitled to payment under the furlough arrangement because the condition for payment, receipt of furlough funds by the respondent, was not met. The claim was therefore dismissed. The judgment referred in its legal background to the Coronavirus Act 2020 and the CJRS eligibility requirement that an employer have a PAYE scheme registered on HMRC's RTI system on 19 March 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim covered unpaid wages from 19 March 2020 to 30 September 2020, with the claimant saying £7,840 was due. The tribunal held that no wages were properly payable while the restaurant was closed on a zero-hours contract, and that any furlough arrangement was conditional on the respondent receiving HMRC funding, which it did not. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- Part II ERA 1996
- CJRS eligibility requirement: PAYE scheme registered on HMRC RTI system on 19 March 2020
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.