Case 2307968/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H Hutchinson v St George’s Church of England Foundation School — 2026
- Case reference
- 2307968/2020
- Decision date
- 24 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms H Hutchinson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 2 February 2026 the Tribunal wrote to Ms H Hutchinson warning that it was considering striking out the claim because it appeared not to have been actively pursued, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing.
The claimant did not reply. On that basis, Employment Judge Andrews struck out the claim on 24 March 2026. The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying employment complaint and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the substantive type of claim. It records that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued, after a warning letter under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 and no reply from the claimant. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.