Case 2308154/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Montiadora v Hani Mansour M Khafaji — 2023
- Case reference
- 2308154/2020
- Decision date
- 30 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Taylor Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Montiadora
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 2 May 2022, the tribunal gave Miss R Montiadora an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing about why the complaints of unlawful deduction of wages, breach of contract, and a declaration that the respondent failed to provide itemized pay statements should not be struck out on the basis that they had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the complaints.
The judgment records no substantive determination on liability or remedy beyond the strike-out order, and it was signed by Employment Judge Taylor on 30 October 2023.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal referred to this complaint as part of the claim struck out for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal referred to this complaint as part of the claim struck out for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | The reasons also refer to a request for a declaration that the respondent failed to provide itemized pay statements; this was struck out with the other complaints. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.