Case 2308167/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs P Filip v Mr Jimmy Kamya T/a Mayday Drycleaners — 2023
- Case reference
- 2308167/2020
- Decision date
- 18 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs P Filip
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis one-page judgment, dated 18 April 2023 and issued by Employment Judge Tsamados, covers case references 2308167/2020 and 2308177/2020. The tribunal recorded that the respondent's response was struck out.
The reason given was that, by a letter dated 20 September 2022, the tribunal had given the respondent an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the response should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The respondent did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The judgment records no merits findings on the underlying claims and no monetary remedy. It states that the respondent remains entitled to notice of hearings and decisions, but may participate in any hearing only to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records only that the respondent's response was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. It does not determine the merits of the underlying claim heads. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.