Case 2308169/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Heidi Jerrard v Caterham Ex Servicemens and Social Club Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2308169/2020
- Decision date
- 11 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Abbott
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Heidi Jerrard
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 7 September 2021, Employment Judge Abbott sitting alone found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and had made an unauthorised deduction from her wages. Written reasons issued on 11 October 2021 were limited to the calculation of the sums payable, after the parties could not agree quantum and the tribunal determined the figures on paper from the claimant’s emailed submissions and the bundle.
On holiday pay, the tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to statutory minimum holiday pay for the period 22 March to 4 July 2020, calculated on a pro rata basis as 1.6 weeks. Using regulation 16 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, the tribunal assessed the claimant’s average weekly hours over the 52 weeks before the unpaid period by reference to 194.5 hours worked, giving an average of 3.74 hours per week, and an average hourly rate of £8.49. That produced holiday pay of £50.80.
On the wages claim, the tribunal considered furlough payments for the same period. It recorded that the claimant’s email of 15 September 2021 showed she did not pursue a claim in relation to furlough wages from 27 April 2020 onwards, but it nevertheless quantified the shortfall by reference to the figures in the bundle and the claimant’s own assumption that £30.02 was the correct weekly gross furlough payment. On that basis, the tribunal calculated total furlough payments due at £446.01, against £380.66 actually paid, leaving a shortfall of £65.35. The respondent was ordered to pay that sum as an unauthorised deduction from wages.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to statutory holiday pay for 22 March to 4 July 2020 and calculated the sum at £50.80 using a 52-week average under regulation 16 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £51 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found a shortfall in furlough payments and ordered the respondent to pay £65.35 as an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £65 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £116
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- regulation 16 of the Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.