Case 2308171/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Heath, TU representative and interpreter, Ms M Parker For the First v Mr O Darley, Solicitor For the Second Respondent: Mr T Brennan, Make UK Representative — 2022
- Case reference
- 2308171/2020
- Decision date
- 10 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Morton Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Heath, TU representative and interpreter, Ms M Parker For the First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the 22 February 2022 hearing, Employment Judge Morton considered the Claimant's claim against the Second Respondent. The written judgment records that the claim was presented outside the statutory three-month time limit in s123(1)(a) Equality Act 2010.
The Tribunal nevertheless decided that it was just and equitable to extend time, and therefore that it had jurisdiction to hear the claim. This record does not contain any merits findings or any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written judgment records only a limitation/jurisdiction ruling under s123(1)(a) Equality Act 2010: the claim against the Second Respondent was out of time, but time was extended as just and equitable so the Tribunal had jurisdiction. The underlying substantive complaint is not specified in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s123(1)(a) Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable to extend time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.