Case 2308242/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Aprea v Danny Romano t/a Spaghetti Tree Sutton — 2021
- Case reference
- 2308242/2020
- Decision date
- 10 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Aprea
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a Rule 21 judgment under the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The respondent, Danny Romano t/a Spaghetti Tree Sutton, failed to present a response to the claim.
Because no response was filed, the tribunal stated that the claim succeeds. The extracted judgment text does not identify the substantive claims in issue, so no further finding on liability is set out in the judgment text provided.
The tribunal did not assess remedy in this judgment. It recorded that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined in due course.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Rule 21 judgment. The extracted text does not specify the underlying causes of action; it states only that the respondent failed to present a response and that the claim succeeds, with remedy to be determined in due course. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21
- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.