Case 2308270/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Oltu v A&DF Ltd (12288873) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2308270/2020
- Decision date
- 16 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Oltu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 09 August 2021, the tribunal told Mrs N Oltu that A&DF Ltd had been dissolved and that she needed to apply to have the respondent restored to the Register of Companies. The judgment records that a Central London County Court order dated 14 October 2022 struck out the claimant's restoration application for failure to comply with the court's orders.
The tribunal then noted that, by correspondence dated 17 March 2023, the claimant did not inform it whether she had any further pending applications in the County Court. It found there was no evidence that she was actively pursuing the claim to the tribunal's satisfaction, and on that basis the claim was struck out. The judgment does not record any merits findings or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal struck out the claim because the respondent had been dissolved, the claimant had not shown that the respondent had been restored to the Register of Companies, and there was no evidence that the claim was being actively pursued to the tribunal's satisfaction. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal struck out the claim on the same procedural basis: the respondent had been dissolved, the County Court restoration application had been struck out, and the claimant did not respond with evidence of any further pending application or active pursuit of the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.