Case 2308330/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J v A Ferreira Lopes Da Silva Elis UK Limited and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 2308330/2020
- Decision date
- 1 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Appearances
- Venue
- London South
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr J
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe extracted judgment records a telephone hearing before Employment Judge Martin, with the claimant appearing in person and counsel appearing for both respondents. The only substantive order visible in the text is that, after the claimant withdrew his claim against the second respondent, the claim against Kings College NHS Foundation Trust was dismissed.
No merits findings, liability analysis, or monetary remedy are set out in the extracted text. The document also contains an internal date inconsistency, stating the hearing was on 22 November 2022 while the judgment is dated 23 November 2021 and sent on 1 December 2021.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted text does not identify the underlying cause of action. It records that, after the claimant withdrew his claim against the second respondent, that claim was dismissed. The text also contains an internal date inconsistency: it says the hearing was on 22 November 2022, but the judgment is dated 23 November 2021 and sent on 1 December 2021. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.