Case 2308344/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v London Ambulance Service NHS Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 2308344/2020
- Decision date
- 18 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cheetham QC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary judgment dealing with an amendment application and the respondent's application to strike out parts of the claim as out of time. The tribunal did not allow the claimant to amend the claim to add an allegation of race discrimination about a request for time off to attend a funeral made on 19 December 2017.
On the respondent's strike-out application, the tribunal decided that the race discrimination allegation concerning the claimant's application for the Team Manager post, including an alleged failure to provide written feedback, had been brought in time and would proceed to the final hearing. Earlier discrimination allegations were to stand as background evidence only, as recorded at a previous preliminary hearing.
For the wages complaints, the tribunal struck out the complaint about alleged unauthorised deductions between 9 March and 25 May 2020 because it was out of time. The complaint about alleged unauthorised deductions in respect of split shifts was found to have been brought in time and was allowed to proceed, subject to the claimant providing particulars of the basis, dates, and amounts claimed.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The application to amend the claim to add an allegation of race discrimination concerning a 19 December 2017 request for time off to attend a funeral was not allowed. | Other | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | The allegation of race discrimination concerning the application for the Team Manager post, including alleged failure to provide written feedback, was found to have been brought in time and was allowed to proceed to the final hearing. Earlier allegations of discrimination were treated as background evidence only. | Other | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages between 9 March and 25 May 2020 was struck out because it was brought out of time. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of unauthorised deduction of wages in respect of split shifts was found to have been brought in time and was allowed to proceed to the final hearing, with the claimant directed to provide further particulars. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.