Case 2308632/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Hall v All of US Networks Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2308632/2020
- Decision date
- 22 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McLaren
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Hall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge McLaren dealt with the claims on the papers. The tribunal found that All of Us Networks Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Miss N Hall’s wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,800.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It therefore ordered the respondent to pay damages of £14,000 for the notice period.
In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £4,644.23. The listed sums produce a total monetary award of £21,444.23.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,800 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment states the dismissal was in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £14,000 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states the respondent failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £4,644 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £21,444
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.