Case 2308779/2020 · Employment Tribunal
M Belcher v Ellington Infant School, and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 2308779/2020
- Decision date
- 23 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews
Parties
3 namedClaimant
M Belcher
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that, by a letter dated 23 June 2025, it gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued. The judgment states that the claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make any sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing.
On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment contains no determination of the substantive merits of the underlying claim and no award of compensation or other remedy. The decision was approved by Employment Judge Andrews on 27 September 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not specify the underlying legal category of the claim. The Tribunal struck the claim out because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.