Case 2308942/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Martins v Cameron & Cooper Limited t/a The Beech House — 2021
- Case reference
- 2308942/2020
- Decision date
- 28 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khalil
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Martins
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mrs A Martins' complaint of unfair dismissal. It first gave her an opportunity, by letter dated 11 February 2021, to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out on the basis that she did not have the requisite two years' service to pursue an unfair dismissal claim under section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal complaint. The judgment records that the claimant's remaining claim(s) stayed listed for a preliminary hearing on 12 May 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint because the claimant did not have the requisite 2 years' service to pursue an unfair dismissal claim under section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996, and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing after being given the opportunity to do so by letter dated 11 February 2021. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.