Case 2309494/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Islam v Jar Site Solutions Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2309494/2020
- Decision date
- 20 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge England Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Islam
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr M Islam, brought claims for deduction of wages and holiday pay against JAR Site Solutions Ltd. The hearing took place on 20 June 2022 at London South (CVP) before Employment Judge England, with Mr Islam appearing in person and Mrs Riches, the respondent's director, appearing for the respondent.
The Tribunal dismissed both claims. It held that the claims for deduction of wages and holiday pay were out of time, and therefore the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider them. No substantive findings on liability were recorded beyond the time-limit point.
The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed because the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider the claim, as it was presented out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed because the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider the claim, as it was presented out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.