Case 2309647/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Inderjit Poonia v Frog Diamond Drilling Holdings Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 2309647/2025
- Decision date
- 24 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Inderjit Poonia
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn a Rule 22 judgment, no response having been received from Frog Diamond Drilling Holdings Limited, the tribunal decided that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from Inderjit Poonia's wages and awarded £7,200. It also found that Poonia was entitled to £4,032 for 14 days of annual leave accrued but not taken when her employment ended.
The statutory redundancy payment claim was found well founded, resulting in an award of £20,851. The tribunal also found that the respondent breached Poonia's employment contract by not paying notice pay and awarded £12,460.08, representing twelve weeks' net pay. The total award was £44,543.08, payable within 14 days, with Poonia responsible for any tax on the payments.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £7,200 |
| Holiday pay | Award for 14 days of accrued but untaken annual leave. | Upheld | — | £4,032 |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment claim found well founded. | Upheld | — | £20,851 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay representing twelve weeks' net pay. | Upheld | — | £12,460 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £44,543
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.