Case 2310226/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T W Noor v Fulwell London United Busways Limited (T/a) RATP DEV Transit) — 2025
- Case reference
- 2310226/2024
- Decision date
- 10 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khalil Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T W Noor
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 28 judgment dismissing the claims after no response was received to the Tribunal's Order dated 15 January 2025. The judgment is a default disposal and does not contain any substantive findings on the underlying merits of the pleadings.
The decision was approved by Regional Employment Judge Khalil Date on 10 April 2025. No remedy was awarded and no monetary figures are recorded in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed under Rule 28 following no response to the Tribunal's Order dated 15 January 2025; the judgment does not separate out any specific merits findings or award for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed under Rule 28 following no response to the Tribunal's Order dated 15 January 2025; the judgment does not separate out any specific merits findings or award for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Dismissed under Rule 28 following no response to the Tribunal's Order dated 15 January 2025; the judgment does not separate out any specific merits findings or award for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.