Case 2310228/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M De Loureiro v Clarion Housing Association Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2310228/2025
- Decision date
- 15 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rice-Birchall Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M De Loureiro
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with a single complaint by Mr M De Loureiro against Clarion Housing Association Limited: failure to make reasonable adjustments. The hearing was at London South by CVP on 15 October 2025 before Employment Judge Rice-Birchall, with Mr Gray appearing for the claimant and Mr Cook, Counsel, for the respondent.
The judgment states that the reasonable adjustments complaint was struck out under the Employment Tribunal Rules because it had no reasonable prospect of success. No written reasons were provided in the record, although the judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment. The decision therefore records a struck-out disability discrimination complaint and no remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The only complaint recorded was failure to make reasonable adjustments. It was struck out under the Employment Tribunal Rules because it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.