Case 2310950/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs F Cope v The Park Pre-School LTD. t/a Cheeky Little Monkeys Nursery — 2025
- Case reference
- 2310950/2024
- Decision date
- 14 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hart Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs F Cope
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the London South Employment Tribunal on 2 December 2024. The respondent indicated that it did not intend to defend the claim, and judgment was entered for the claimant under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £1,298, calculated on an effective date of termination of 18 July 2024, age 31, 5 complete years of service, and a gross weekly pay of £259.60. The respondent had made a part payment of £550, and was ordered to pay the claimant the outstanding balance of £748 gross. The hearing listed for 23 April 2025 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Total statutory redundancy entitlement assessed at £1,298 (5 years' service, age 31, gross weekly pay £259.60); respondent had made a part payment of £550, leaving £748 gross outstanding and ordered to be paid. Judgment entered under rule 22 as the respondent indicated no intention to defend. | Upheld | — | £748 |
| Redundancy | Total statutory redundancy entitlement assessed at £1,298 (5 years' service, age 31, gross weekly pay £259.60); respondent had made a part payment of £550, leaving £748 gross outstanding and ordered to be paid. Judgment entered under rule 22 as the respondent indicated no intention to defend. | Upheld | — | £748 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £748
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.