Case 2310951/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Z Perry v The Park Pre-School LTD. t/a Cheeky Little Monkeys Nursery — 2025
- Case reference
- 2310951/2024
- Decision date
- 14 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hart Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Z Perry
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the London South Employment Tribunal on 02 December 2024. The respondent indicated it did not intend to defend the claim, and judgment was entered for the claimant under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. The calculation was based on an effective date of termination of 18 July 2024, the claimant being aged 34, with 5 complete years of service and a gross weekly pay of £270.60, producing a total redundancy entitlement of £1,353. The respondent had made a part payment of £550, leaving £803 gross payable to the claimant. The hearing listed on 23 April 2025 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Total redundancy entitlement calculated at £1,353 (5 complete years of service at age 34, gross weekly pay £270.60). Respondent had already made a part payment of £550, so the outstanding sum ordered to be paid is £803 gross. | Upheld | — | £803 |
| Redundancy | Total redundancy entitlement calculated at £1,353 (5 complete years of service at age 34, gross weekly pay £270.60). Respondent had already made a part payment of £550, so the outstanding sum ordered to be paid is £803 gross. | Upheld | — | £803 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £803
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.