Case 2313068/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A M Janicka v Curtis Holt Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 2313068/2024
- Decision date
- 11 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A M Janicka
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant's complaint of breach of contract in respect of notice pay was dismissed on withdrawal.
It also records that the claimant's complaint of detriment by reason of whistleblowing was dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment states that the claimant's remaining complaints remain, but it does not identify those remaining complaints or determine any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the complaint of breach of contract in respect of notice pay is dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that the complaint of detriment by reason of whistleblowing is dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.