Case 2313870/2024 · Employment Tribunal
J Unsted v Wickes Building Supplies Limited Held at: London South Employment Tribunal — 2025
- Case reference
- 2313870/2024
- Decision date
- 18 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burge
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Ms C Oldfield, Ms N Christofi
Parties
2 namedClaimant
J Unsted
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at London South before Employment Judge Burge with Ms C Oldfield and Ms N Christofi as members. The written record states that the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well founded and was dismissed. It also records that the Claimant's claims of discrimination arising from disability and failure to make reasonable adjustments failed and were dismissed.
The judgment does not set out the tribunal's reasoning in the written record. It notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons will not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties. No monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.