Case 2347010/2013 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Cockram v Air Products plc — 2021
- Case reference
- 2347010/2013
- Decision date
- 13 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Cockram
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Wright recorded that, having received no correspondence regarding the claim since 2017, the Tribunal dismissed the claim on 13 September 2021. The extract is a one-line disposal and does not contain any merits findings, legal analysis, or separate conclusions on liability for the underlying claims. No remedy was awarded or quantified in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The extract does not set out separate reasoning for this claim; it states only that the Tribunal dismissed the claim because it had received no correspondence since 2017. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The extract does not set out separate reasoning for this claim; it states only that the Tribunal dismissed the claim because it had received no correspondence since 2017. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extract does not set out separate reasoning for this claim; it states only that the Tribunal dismissed the claim because it had received no correspondence since 2017. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.