Case 2359273/2012 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Babb v Jeffery (Wandsworth) Ltd (In Administration) and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 2359273/2012
- Decision date
- 13 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss R Babb
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was claim number 2359273/2012 brought by Miss R Babb against Jeffery (Wandsworth) Ltd (In Administration) and Go Motor Retailing Ltd (Formerly Whitmore's of Edenbridge Ltd). The judgment is a brief decision by Employment Judge Wright dated 13 September 2021.
The tribunal recorded that it had received no correspondence from either party regarding the claim since 2015. On that basis, the tribunal dismissed the claim.
The judgment does not contain any findings on the underlying merits of the listed redundancy, sex discrimination or unfair dismissal complaints, and it records no award or other remedy. It is therefore a procedural dismissal rather than a merits determination.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The short judgment dismisses the claim after recording that neither party had corresponded since 2015. It does not give separate merits reasons for this head. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment dismisses the claim without any merits findings. No separate reasoning is given for the sex discrimination head in the text supplied. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim was dismissed because there had been no correspondence from either party since 2015. No compensation or merits determination is recorded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.