Case 2359599/2013 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I McDonald v British Airways plc — 2022
- Case reference
- 2359599/2013
- Decision date
- 17 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I McDonald
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. It recorded that, by letters dated 29 September 2021 and 13 April 2022, the Claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The Tribunal found that the Claimant had failed to make written representations, or any sufficient representations, explaining why the claim should not be struck out, and had not requested a hearing. The claim was therefore struck out.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states only that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. This claim type follows the gov.uk listing category rather than detail in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states only that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. This claim type follows the gov.uk listing category rather than detail in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.