Case 2400002/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Stewart v Trafford Housing Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 2400002/2022
- Decision date
- 10 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Stewart
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Dunlop, sitting by video in Manchester, the tribunal considered whether Mr E Stewart satisfied the statutory definition of disability under s.6 Equality Act 2010. The judgment records only that preliminary issue and does not set out any merits findings on the wider claims.
The tribunal found that Mr Stewart was a disabled person within the meaning of s.6 Equality Act 2010 from 29 July 2021 to 8 August 2021. It also records that the respondent conceded that he was disabled from 9 August 2021 onwards.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only. The tribunal found that Mr E Stewart was a disabled person within the meaning of s.6 Equality Act 2010 from 29 July 2021 to 8 August 2021; the respondent conceded disability from 9 August 2021 onwards. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.