Case 2400005/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Allcock v Skin HQ Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2400005/2022
- Decision date
- 5 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Allcock
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal proceeded under rule 21 because the respondent failed to present a valid response. Employment Judge Leach decided that a determination could properly be made on the claim in the respondent's absence.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It ordered the respondent to pay damages of £375.00 for that breach.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £712.50 for holiday pay, making the total award £1,087.50. The judgment stated that the sum awarded was to be paid within 14 days of the date the judgment was sent to the parties, and a separate notice explained the tribunal interest provisions if the award remained unpaid after that period.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £375 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £713 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,088
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.