Case 2400010/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Con-ui v Mohammed Zia — 2023
- Case reference
- 2400010/2023
- Decision date
- 20 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McDonald
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Con-ui
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal, sitting under Employment Judge McDonald, struck out the claim. The reasons state that by a letter dated 11 October 2023 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal held that the claim should be struck out. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying claim on its merits.
The judgment was sent to the parties on 20 November 2023. No monetary award was made and no remedy was assessed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive cause of action in the reasons. It records that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued after the claimant failed to make sufficient representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 11 October 2023. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.