Case 2400012/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J J Turton v Axiom Ince Limited (In Administration) and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 2400012/2024
- Decision date
- 26 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr J J Turton
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that the claimant's complaint under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was well-founded. The complaint concerned the first respondent's failure to comply with the requirements of section 188 of the 1992 Act.
The Tribunal ordered the first respondent to pay the claimant, who was proposed for redundancy but reasonably resigned on 31 August 2023, remuneration for 90 days beginning on 31 August 2023. The judgment also states that the Recoupment Regulations apply.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the claimant's complaint under section 189 TULRCA 1992, concerning failure to comply with section 188, was well-founded and succeeds. The award is described as 90 days' remuneration, but no monetary figure is given. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.