Case 2400013/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Smith & others (see attached schedule) v 15:17 Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2400013/2022
- Decision date
- 11 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Smith & others (see attached schedule)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal issued a letter dated 12 December 2022 giving the claimants an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claims should not be struck out. The stated concern was that the claimants had not told the Tribunal that they had obtained court permission to allow the claims to proceed, and that the claims had therefore not been actively pursued.
The claimants did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Phil Allen ordered that the claims be struck out. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the merits or any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment struck out the claims in the multiple case numbers listed in the attached schedule. The reasons do not identify the underlying claim type(s); the strike-out was for failure to show that court permission had been obtained to allow the claims to proceed and because the claims had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.