Case 2400019/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Day v Stobart Rail Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2400019/2019
- Decision date
- 10 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicol Representation
- Venue
- Carlisle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Day
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Carlisle on 26 March 2019, before Employment Judge Nicol, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Miss N Brand, solicitor. The only substantive complaint recorded in the judgment was a detriment claim arising from a public interest disclosure.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant’s complaint that he suffered a detriment after making a public interest disclosure was dismissed because the claimant withdrew it. There was therefore no findings on the merits of the whistleblowing allegation.
The tribunal also recorded that the correct name of the respondent is Stobart Rail Limited and ordered the records to be amended accordingly. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The claimant’s complaint that he suffered a detriment after making a public interest disclosure was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.