Case 2400025/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Day v Skill and Works Solutions Limited t/a The Growth Company Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2400025/2022
- Decision date
- 30 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Day
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a remote telephone hearing on 23 August 2022, Employment Judge K M Ross, sitting alone, dealt with the claimant's ordinary unfair dismissal claim against Skill and Works Solutions Limited t/a The Growth Company Ltd. The claimant did not attend; the respondent was represented by Ms Fitzgerald, Solicitor.
The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal claim because the claimant had insufficient service, recorded as two years, to bring an ordinary unfair dismissal claim under sections 95 and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment records that the claim was struck out on that basis.
The tribunal also recorded that the claimant's other claims were not affected by this decision and would proceed to hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the claimant's ordinary unfair dismissal claim under sections 95 and 98 ERA 1996 because he had insufficient service (two years) to bring such a claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.95 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.