Case 2400028/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Ofaha 1st v Health and Care Professions Council — 2026
- Case reference
- 2400028/2025
- Decision date
- 7 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Ofaha 1st
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the public preliminary hearing on 7 April 2026, the Tribunal held that it lacked jurisdiction to hear discrimination allegations 1.1 to 1.5 and 1.7 to 1.11 brought by Mr I Ofaha against The Health and Care Professions Council. Those complaints were dismissed. The allegation numbers refer to the list of issues annexed to Judge Allen's note of the preliminary hearing of 5 August 2025.
Discrimination allegations 1.6 and 1.12 were unaffected and could proceed to the final hearing on 1 and 2 February 2027 for determination. Reasons were given orally. The written judgment does not explain the basis for the jurisdictional finding or identify the protected characteristics involved. It records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Discrimination allegations 1.1 to 1.5 and 1.7 to 1.11 were dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. They are grouped here because the judgment does not identify their discrimination types or protected characteristics. Allegations 1.6 and 1.12 remain pending and were unaffected by this judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.