Case 2400037/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss I Keighley v ERA Sports & Education Ltd and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 2400037/2022
- Decision date
- 1 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss I Keighley
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 13 July 2022 Employment Judge Ord made a case management order requiring the claimant to confirm in writing by 4.00pm on 27 July 2022 whether she intended to pursue the claim against the second respondent to final hearing. The judgment records that the claimant did not provide that confirmation by the deadline.
As a result, the tribunal recorded that the claim was dismissed in its entirety without further order. The judgment heading states that the claim is struck out. No substantive findings on the merits of any discrimination or other claim were made.
The hearing listed for 5, 6 and 7 September 2023 was vacated and did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | On 13 July 2022 Employment Judge Ord made case management order 2 stating that unless the claimant confirmed in writing by 4.00pm on 27 July 2022 that she intended to pursue her claim against the second respondent to final hearing, her claim would be dismissed in its entirety without further order. The judgment records that the claimant failed to confirm her intentions by that deadline and the claim was dismissed; the judgment heading states the claim is struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.