Case 2400039/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss F Ahmad v Human Relief Foundation — 2022
- Case reference
- 2400039/2021
- Decision date
- 29 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss F Ahmad
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary issue hearing before Employment Judge Batten sitting alone on 23 September 2022. The respondent conceded that Miss F Ahmad was a disabled person at the material time by reason of asthma.
The tribunal also found that she was not a disabled person at the material time by reason of anxiety or suicidal ideation. No substantive liability issues or remedy were determined in this judgment, which records only the disability-status ruling.
Written reasons were not provided because reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written request was made within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties on 29 September 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary issue only. The respondent conceded that the claimant was a disabled person at the material time by reason of asthma. The tribunal found that she was not a disabled person at the material time by reason of anxiety or suicidal ideation. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.