Case 2400039/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J E Maxwell Mr T Addison v HWS Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2400039/2023
- Decision date
- 16 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J E Maxwell Mr T Addison
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a valid response on time to either claim, and the Employment Judge determined the claims under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment was therefore made on the papers rather than after a contested hearing.
As to Mrs J E Maxwell, the tribunal found that she was dismissed by reason of redundancy and held that she was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,185. The judgment records the calculation as 1.5 weeks' pay for each full year worked when the claimant was 41 or older, applied as 1.5 x 15 x £186.
As to Mr T Addison, the tribunal similarly found that he was dismissed by reason of redundancy and held that he was entitled to a redundancy payment of £7,499.50. No further breakdown for that amount is given in the extracted text.
The written notice attached to the judgment states that, if the sums are not paid within 14 days after the relevant decision day of 16 May 2023, interest may accrue from 17 May 2023 at the stipulated rate of 8% per annum under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990. No interest amount is quantified in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Mrs J E Maxwell: the tribunal found she was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £4,185. The judgment states the calculation as 1.5 week's pay for each full year worked when aged 41 or older, using 1.5 x 15 x £186. | Upheld | — | £4,185 |
| Redundancy | Mr T Addison: the tribunal found he was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £7,499.50. No separate calculation breakdown is set out in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | £7,500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,685
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 article 12
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.