Case 2400047/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Michael Stephenson v James Killelea and Company Limited (in Administration) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2400047/2024
- Decision date
- 17 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Michael Stephenson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Michael Stephenson's complaint was heard at Manchester (in chambers) on 14 May 2024 before Employment Judge K M Ross. The judgment records that the respondent failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 in relation to redundancy dismissals, and that the claimant's complaint under section 189 was well-founded.
The Tribunal made a protective award under section 189(3) of the 1992 Act and ordered the respondent to pay remuneration equivalent to a protected period of 90 days beginning on 3 January 2024. The written record also states that the Recoupment Regulations apply, and that reasons had been given orally at the hearing so written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Complaint under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for failure to comply with section 188; protective award made for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 3 January 2024. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.