Case 2400048/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. P.K. Upadhyay v Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 2400048/2024
- Decision date
- 24 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. P.K. Upadhyay
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, a Speciality Doctor employed by Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust between September 2022 and September 2023, brought two unlawful deduction from wages claims under s13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The first concerned non-payment for additional weekend shifts; the second concerned his placement on the spinal pay point of the Speciality Doctor pay scale. The matter was heard by Judge Callan sitting alone at Manchester by CVP on 7 February 2025, with the decision reserved.
On claim 1, the tribunal found that the claimant had only complied with the respondent's requirement to submit a claim for payment within three months of work being performed in respect of the shifts on 12 and 13 November 2022 and 24 and 25 June 2023. Other shifts within claim 1 were submitted outside that internal procedure and so were not held to have been unlawfully deducted. The November 2022 non-payment was treated as forming a 'series' with the June 2023 non-payment (each being for £1,170 gross and attributable to payroll error rather than a deliberate withholding), bringing the earlier date within time. With the ACAS s207B extension, the tribunal had jurisdiction and upheld claim 1 in part, awarding £2,340 gross calculated at £65 per hour for nine hours on each of the two days, subject to tax and National Insurance.
On claim 2, the tribunal interpreted Schedule 12.5 of the Speciality Doctor 2021 Terms and Conditions and accepted the NHS Employers' organisation's view (email of 20 September 2023) that prior Locally Employed Doctor or clinical fellow service mirroring the 2002/2016 TCS is not 'equivalent' to Speciality Doctor service and so cannot be counted towards starting salary. The claimant's argument that his 16 years of NHS experience should be taken into account was rejected as the contractual provision is limited to service on a Speciality Doctor grade contract. Claim 2 was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim 1: unauthorised deductions from wages contrary to s13 ERA 1996. Upheld in part — in respect of extra weekend shifts worked on 11 and 12 November 2022 and 24 and 25 June 2023. Other dates within claim 1 were found not to have been claimed within the respondent's 3-month internal procedure and so were not unlawfully deducted. Award calculated at £65/hour for 9 hours each day across the two weekends (2 x £1,170 = £2,340) subject to tax and NI. | Upheld | — | £2,340 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim 2: alleged incorrect spinal pay point on the Speciality Doctor pay scale resulting in underpayment. Tribunal found, in line with NHS Employers' advice of 20 September 2023, that prior Locally Employed Doctor / clinical fellow service was not 'equivalent' under Schedule 12.5 of the Speciality Doctor 2021 TCS and could not be counted towards starting salary. Claim dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim 1: unauthorised deductions from wages contrary to s13 ERA 1996. Upheld in part — in respect of extra weekend shifts worked on 11 and 12 November 2022 and 24 and 25 June 2023. Other dates within claim 1 were found not to have been claimed within the respondent's 3-month internal procedure and so were not unlawfully deducted. Award calculated at £65/hour for 9 hours each day across the two weekends (2 x £1,170 = £2,340) subject to tax and NI. | Upheld | — | £2,340 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,340
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.207B Employment Rights Act 1996
- Schedule 12.5 Speciality Doctor 2021 Terms and Conditions
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.