Case 2400052/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Gillam v Stock Lease Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2400052/2019
- Decision date
- 27 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sherratt
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Gillam
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 9 November 2019, the Tribunal gave Mr T Gillam an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make any written representations and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Sherratt ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment does not contain any substantive findings on the underlying merits of the pleaded claims, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. It does not set out any merits findings on this claim type. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. It does not set out any merits findings on this claim type. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.