Case 2400061/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P G Baines v NWE Logistics Limited (in Voluntary Liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2400061/2020
- Decision date
- 20 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P G Baines
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Batten issued a Rule 21 judgment in case numbers 2400061/2020 and 2400915/2020 on 16 July 2020. The tribunal found that NWE Logistics Limited (in Voluntary Liquidation) had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr P G Baines's wages and ordered payment of £1,600.00 gross. It also found that he had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £1,673.65 net.
The tribunal further found that Mr Baines was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,000.00. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay outstanding holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,120.00 gross. The separate notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 states that unpaid sums may carry interest if not paid within 14 days of the relevant decision day, which was 20 July 2020, but the extracted text does not state any quantified interest figure.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,600.00. | Upheld | — | £1,600 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages awarded in the net sum of £1,673.65. | Upheld | — | £1,674 |
| Redundancy | Found to have been dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,000.00. | Upheld | — | £3,000 |
| Holiday pay | Ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,120.00 for outstanding holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £1,120 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,394
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.