Case 2400063/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Fuchs v Thomas Cook Airlines Ltd (In Compulsory Liquidation) and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 2400063/2020
- Decision date
- 4 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms S Fuchs
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal issued judgment under rule 21 without a hearing because the first respondent had not presented a response, the Official Receiver confirmed the protective award claims would not be contested, and the Secretary of State had made legal submissions. The first respondent was in compulsory liquidation, and the High Court had granted permission for the claim to proceed.
The Tribunal found that the first respondent employed over 20 employees at the Manchester Airport site, that the claimant worked for Thomas Cook Airlines Limited, and that the first respondent went into compulsory liquidation on 23 September 2019. The claimant was notified on 11 October 2019 that her employment would terminate with immediate effect.
The Tribunal found there had been no proper warning, notice, or consultation with recognised trade unions or the claimant before 23 September 2019, no consultation with the claimant between 23 September 2019 and 11 October 2019, and no elected or appointed employee representatives for consultation under section 188A. It held that the first respondent breached section 188 of the 1992 Act and made a protective award for the maximum protected period of 90 days beginning on 23 September 2019, subject to the recoupment provisions.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award claim under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for failure to comply with collective consultation requirements under section 188. Classified as other because the taxonomy has no specific protective award category and the judgment did not adjudicate a statutory redundancy payment claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 188A Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.