Case 2400068/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Mitchell v Northern Building Design Associates Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2400068/2021
- Decision date
- 8 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cookson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Mitchell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 26 October 2021, the tribunal gave Mrs A Mitchell an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why her claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that she had not complied with the tribunal's order of 8 April 2021 to disclose documents and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 26 to 30 September 2022 was vacated and did not take place. The judgment was sent to the parties on 10 March 2022 and is signed by Employment Judge Cookson on 3 March 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim(s); the tribunal struck out the claim because the claimant had not complied with the order of 8 April 2021 to disclose documents and had not actively pursued the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.