Case 2400069/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Javeria Azam v Sabrina Saddique — 2023
- Case reference
- 2400069/2023
- Decision date
- 22 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cline
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Javeria Azam
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place at Manchester by CVP on 12 May 2023 before Employment Judge Cline sitting alone. The tribunal gave an oral judgment at the hearing, and the written record states that no written reasons would be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal’s note on reasons.
The tribunal struck out the claimant’s claim for unfair dismissal and also struck out the claim for a redundancy payment. The record does not set out detailed reasons in the written decision, only the formal outcome of those two claims.
The tribunal also recorded that the claimant’s claims for unpaid sums had been brought in time and were permitted to continue. No final liability finding or monetary award was made in this decision for those claims.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | The tribunal held that the claimant's claims for unpaid sums had been brought in time and were permitted to continue. No final merits outcome was recorded in this decision. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.