Case 2400072/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Ponce Corpas Mr J Abreu Carrillo v Single Resource Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2400072/2021
- Decision date
- 18 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Ponce Corpas Mr J Abreu Carrillo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn the linked cases numbered 2400072/2021 and 2400073/2021, Employment Judge Johnson recorded that the claim was struck out. Before that order, by letter dated 21 April 2021 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out.
The stated reason was failure to comply with the tribunal's case management directions sent on 22 January 2021. The judgment contains no merits findings and records no monetary award; it was sent to the parties on 18 May 2021.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The extracted judgment does not state the substantive merits; it records that the claim was struck out for failure to comply with case management directions. The underlying listing category for this case is breach of contract. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted judgment does not state the substantive merits; it records that the claim was struck out for failure to comply with case management directions. The underlying listing category for this case is unlawful deduction from wages. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.