Case 2400072/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Whitewood v Mr C Griffith — 2022
- Case reference
- 2400072/2022
- Decision date
- 7 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ganner
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Whitewood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Liverpool by CVP on 30 June 2022 before Employment Judge Ganner sitting alone. The respondent did not attend and the claimant appeared in person. Oral reasons were given at the hearing, and the written record notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
The tribunal recorded that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. It also found that the claims for unauthorised deductions from wages and for pay in lieu of holiday on termination of employment failed and were dismissed. No monetary remedy was awarded and no separate compensation figures were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states: 'The claim of unfair dismissal is dismissed upon withdrawal.' | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to 'unauthorised deductions from wages' and says this claim failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment refers to 'pay in lieu of holiday on termination of employment' and says this claim failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.