Case 2400080/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Jones Mr L Brownley Mr D Fay v Bolton at Home Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2400080/2022
- Decision date
- 27 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Jones Mr L Brownley Mr D Fay
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester on 26 September 2022 before Employment Judge Phil Allen. The claimants were Mr A Jones, Mr L Brownley and Mr D Fay, and the respondent was Bolton at Home Limited. Mr Brownley and Mr Fay appeared in person; Mr Jones did not attend.
The tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claimants' claims for detriment in health and safety cases and unfair dismissal because the claims had not been presented within the required time. On that basis, the claims were dismissed.
The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim for detriment in health and safety cases; dismissed because it was presented outside the time limit and the tribunal held it had no jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because it was presented outside the time limit and the tribunal held it had no jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.